| 12th September 2004 - 06:27:19 PM |
| 9888 : screech\'s beard |
| i have dried up chunks of mr. belding's loads in me. i love you. |
| 12th September 2004 - 09:00:41 PM |
| 9889 : Ox |
| Screech, remember that episode where you Slater, Zack, and Mr. Belding took a spring break trip down to Mexico? Remember when Slater told you and the gang that he was taking you to one of Mexico's infamous 'donkey shows?' Remember when you got excited at the thought of watching a donkey getting sucked off by a hooker in front of a crowd? Remember when you, Slater, Zack, and Mr. Belding showed up at the donkey show arena and waited for the show to begin? Remember when Slater kept ordering beers and putting it on the tab for the four of you? Remember when you got up to go to the bathroom and when you came back to your seat you couldn't find Slater, Zack, or Mr. Belding? Remember when Jose, the show's manager, then came up to you and asked you to pay your tab? Remember when you reached for your wallet only to discover that you had left it back at your hotel? Remember Jose made you get out on the stage to work off the bar tab? Remember when you sucked off two donkeys and then took in the ass from a third before Jose would finally let you leave? Remember your uncomfortable walk out of the show as blood and donkey semen dripped out of your ass? Remember when you got outside and saw Slater, Zack, and Mr. Belding? Remember how they were laughing uncontrollably and told you they had watched the entire event from a little window outside the bar? Slater, Zack, and Mr. Belding got you good that time! |
| 12th September 2004 - 10:16:44 PM |
| 9890 : dustin |
| i love u sexy but i actually dont know u i am just surfing the web and i came to this and decidedd to say hello so ttyl i dont know ur name lol peace out a town!!!! |
| 13th September 2004 - 01:09:13 AM |
| 9891 : Kurt Steinberg |
| Princess Peussie (message 9886), why are you still here? You've never once posted anything funny or even arousingly homo-erotic! Your rants have nothing to do with queer Dustin Diamond-related fantasies. We all know that this webpage was set up to allow Diamond's queer fans to exchange gay fantasies about him and the other cast members - this website has caused thousands of homosexual men to lose their loads over the past 3 years! Please leave and don't come back until you've turned full-blown Liberace gay! - Kurt Steinberg |
| 13th September 2004 - 01:53:46 AM |
| 9892 : |
| fsddgddfffffffffffffff |
| 13th September 2004 - 05:01:39 AM |
| 9893 : bingo |
| you all suck shit |
| 13th September 2004 - 05:22:00 AM |
| 9894 : YOUNG GIRLS KISSING PUSSIES AND MASTURBATION YOUN |
| ß YOUNG GIRLS KISSING PUSSIES AND MASTURBATION YOUNG GIRLS KISSING PUSSIES AND MASTURBATION ë |
| 13th September 2004 - 05:29:33 AM |
| 9895 : bingo |
| I only say that becuase I literally suck shit myself and I enjoy it so much. There's nothing quite like having a nice, big, foul shit popsicle to suck on, don't you agree? Except maybe being raped in the ass by a 15"-cocked Ugandan gentlement named Mtumbe. |
| 13th September 2004 - 06:29:49 AM |
| 9896 : L337 G4m3r |
| Were Steel Battalion: Line of Contact and Phantasy Star Online ever released for the GP32? |
| 13th September 2004 - 07:35:52 AM |
| 9897 : L337 G4m3r |
| I'm also looking for a copy of Queer Strip Poker. Oh yes, and I have full-blown AIDS and swallow approximately 1 gallon of man chowder per day. |
| 13th September 2004 - 08:22:31 AM |
| 9898 : hasans@hem.passagen.se |
| Int. English language version///James WAITE (1990-2004)&Daniel WRETSTRÖM (1983-2000)&Anders GUSTAVSSON (1978-1995) etc. offrades af det blodtörstiga vildkapitalistiska systemet... Dessa omringade unga hjältar skulle inte slaktas om de bara skulle heta PAGROTSKY, SILLBERSKY, JACUBOWSKI, ABRAMOVICZ, HORNYPIGS, WALLENBERGS, BILDERBERGS d.v.s. vara anhöriga till överklassens bastard-bitches piggies&doggies&maitress... Oavsett dessa offer heter Daniel WRETSTRÖM&James WAITE&Tony MUTKA&Osmo VALLO&Mohammad Al-DURRA&Tony DEOGAN&Anders GUSTAVSSON etc.; dessa som "assassinated by judaized imperialism" har något historiskt som gemen: DESSA AVRÄTTADE FÖRSVARSLÖSA OFFER är BARN till NEDTRYCKTA SAMHÄLLSKLASSER... BARNEN till UNDERKLASSEN SLAKTAS så grymt systematiskt, halvofficiellt sätt som upprepar sig och processen pågår därnere,/ supper-makter sponsrar som super-sadistiskt, vildare/ ännu cyniskare i det ockuperade Palestina, Irak, Afghanistan, Chechenia... Medan sionistiska makteliten festar på vårt blöd, sörjer vi bara!.. Vissa ordnar festar medan vissa kramar grevstenar!.. Men det varar inte i evigt!.. Definitivt människominnet och hjäartat ska reagera någon gång som oundviklig, storm-artigt!.. Folkmassor bör inte behandlas om hjärntvättad-lamm eller Guinea-pigs i laboratorium af detta skurkarnas sista fäste!.. Kamrater!.. Historien säger något fint: HÄMNDENS DAG NÄRMAR SIG, absolut, då ska vi vart ska ta vägen alla dessa SHARON-bastard-svinarter&dess samverkande kloakråttor? Vi få se ska dessa skitiga varelser hitta något håll att överleva den här gången, eller inte!... UNDERKLASSENS BARN bör vassa/ smörja om sina vapen!.. HÄMNDEN BÖR VARA SÅ FINT ATT MÄNSKLIGHETEN BEFRIAS HELT DEN HÄR GÅNGEN!... Ta det lugnt, kamrater/ var beredd/ men inte rädd/ Det är vi som sårade arbetarklassens barn/ som ska göra slut med detta tvåbenta-svineriet!.. Nu är det nog och våran tur att göra vårt bästa, visa avgörande kraften!.. Organisera, kommunicera, informera varandra; ta på koll/ se på detta berusade virusets svaga håll/ bevittna den sioniserade imperialismens fall/ som humanmaskerade avfall!..///TERROR&TORTURE&PRISON-CELL/HELL, the cruel face of IMPERIALIST SYSTEMS.../// A Saga on the half-officially TERROR, mostly ruled by the Jewish Financial Lobbies and their multi-medial donated manipulation industry experts/// VALHALLA, Honour Portraits...prepared by SALEM Solidarity Movement&oppressed peoples' PRIDE MARCH against BARBARITY...(Int. English language version) ** - Dear listeners, readers, tv-viewers!.. Welcome!.. A new saga is borning here... Brave people makes these forums available to encourage intelligent and open democratical debate platforms. Users are requested to participate in the spirit of good fellowship and tolerance. The views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of saga tellers.... "Living tales broadcasting" does not mean "fantastical fairy tales", but aims to offer a solution for "living questions of humanity" and one of them begins here, today's well-documented tales!.. Notice it respectfully, please; this is a SAGA; man don't need to be stressed... Avoid to show incredible angry attitudes or overwhelmed happy on such tales.. Test your selfcontrol!.. Well, we are aware, there are a kind of ineresting types, which fanatically programmed to see the similarly robotics and they can not accept the creative brains... Compare yourself with them!..Take it easy; don't to be prisoned of "massmedial brainwashing campaigns"... In normally case there are different openviews, artistical creations, poetry, approximate to the social cases in community; listen to them... If you want to criticize these stories, feel free; do that!.. No doubt!. This is a form of litterature to create essays; of course built a bridge to say out your opinion; do that, please!.. Otherways, you wil just a living witness here; yes, here seems many aggressive robotics making shit after my tales; let them stay on this page as my best evidence.. People needs such testimony; who tells saga, who has shit in his mouth; discover on internet around my saga texts... They are not only my enemies, because I have nothing private conflict with them... In fact they are the fanatical enemies of humanbeing; this is the question... My Grandfader had piggies at farm; all the animals had name there and selected examples prized by true ID cards... I see that Grandfather's true piggies were more respectable than human faced piggies&doggies... Let's these doggies shitting here on internet, mostly using false sexual announcements; let's people witness what a kind kinky planet the two-legged piggies dreaming.. Keep the evidences should be apparently pasted there on internet page, although it's not friendly; all after checking this attack it'll easier to struggle against thus kinky character, who beyond this dirtiness!.. Go on to tell what the newest!.. In fact, we have much more exciting broadcasting tournaments... You see; the fanatics of system are so eager to bite your heel.. No doubt, its typical attitudes of bulldogs and lapdogs of judaized imperialism... But criticism welcomes.... Of course there are different opinions.. Discussion is better than warplanes... Let's create new saga examples and try to build a wonderful socialistical saga-world for whole humanbeing; yes, for human, dear!.. Solidarity regards from saga-teller, additional works of studio-guests, followers on friendly tv channels... ** Chapter -I- ** - What is the newest and greatest programme on tv, today? - IN MEMORIAM MARTYRS of OPPRESSED PEOPLES... - A Tribute to the VIOLENCE VICTIMS? - Absolutely!.. The Saga of Daniel WRETSTRÖM... We are the witness.. You see a dirty process, ongoing here... ProductZional Terrorism&organized violence and its controllants beyond the blood sucker profiteers worldwide, almost the same Imperialist falsification lobbies, nothing else... - I heard before about the ZioniImperialist controlled&Jewish financial supported TERROR&VIOLENCE... - Completely right!.. And this story dedicated to Comrade Daniel as a tribute; yes, this is The Saga of Daniel WRETSTRÖM; a braveheart MARTYR who sacrificed himself for next generations... - Magnifique!.. Let's watch it!.. ** - TERRORISM&VIOLENCE, between establishment and oppressed peoples? - Violated methodes practicing between truth seekers and the lie machines of officially parasites... ** - Terrorism&organized violence changed its face and it turned to be a kind of "Contemporary Industry"... - That is right!.. It has been documented that some attacks on synagogues worldwide were carried out by Jew controlled criminals, fake immigrants imported terrorists, but conveniently blamed on Patriots, dismissed cathegories in community, National Socialists, all other Socialists, Communists, Muslims, all the true Independent Human Rights activists, registrated pursued intellectuals, even Scientists who reject to be polit-whore of dominated power. - To many, this may be surprising and unbelievable, however, there are many documented cases of Zionist terrorists lighting the fires of conflict consistent with meeting the objectives of their nefarious schemes. - But people awakened for example thousands of peoples marched IN MEMORIAM Daniel WRETSTRÖM who been killed by the imported criminal bastards of system... - I witnessed this wonderful marche in Scandinavia!.. - Thousands of people marching every year in Memoriam Daneiel WRETSTRÖM, all together we show our growned solidarity against the organized violence... This is a wonderful act against the Jew controlled Terrorism... - Otherway financial lobbies support the criminal leagues, any groups of anarchist neo-liberal bourgeoisie bastards, for example eXpo&AIPAC collaborators and such labradors.. - I know, these marionettes try to sabotage anniversaries of people... - No matter!.. There are always the willing dogs of judaic Imperialism... It's mo matter they masks themselves as "Antirasist puppies of Capitalism" but people aware that these "mobilized instruments" serve to the Zionist Racism and zionized Imperialsim, nothing else... SALEM-MARTYR marce is a wonderful lesson to demasking all these anarchists, terrorists, well-paid hired fascists... - I agree with you and therefore we join the marche for martyrs of terrorism&organized violence.. Today we join here the marche SALEM, in memory Daniel WRETSTRÖM... - My "thanksgiving" to the martyrs.. Daniel and all other braveheart comrades exposed that Terrorism&organized violence is a comtemporary industry in the hands of ZOG and we must never forget our martyrs... - Where we can find a true independent and well-prepared a documentation on the Jew controlled terrorism&organized violence?.. - By Gladio and Mo$$ad, dear!.. - Don't joke, please!.. It's better the true legal way and not manipulated, I mean!.. - ...sleeping or kidding, boy?!.. You should watch the new broadcasting of Tv Independent Laponia... Redaction already prepared many interesting clips about this subject... - It's beginning in this evening and you'll see many cases of terror&organized violence industry of contemporary imperialism... I mean, not only Daniel WRETSTRÖM or Anders GUSTAVSSON from Scandinavia... It's better to see the cases in a great perspective by such documentaries... I recommend this "true anti-terrorist&anti-violence documentation", to learn anything newest, useful; out of the medial shurks... - Let's watch it!.. ** - Will Anyone Dare to Ask Why? - Why, dear dare? - Attention!! Meta-religion does not support the ideas and opinions expressed in this article. And we are not associated in any way to the source. The ideas and opinions expressed are responsability of the sources. - What are you talking about? - Clip!.. I recommend that you watch on this; "Interviews with Comrade David Duke, National President , European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO) broadcasting on September 15, 2001 - Let's watch!.. - America has a very big problem... We have just experienced the shock of the most spectacular and deadly terror attack in modern history. In an almost surreal scene from a Hollywood movie, on September 11, 2001 hijacked passenger planes crashed directly into the New York World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington. Thousands of Americans were maimed and killed. The costs might even go over the one trillion dollar mark, and the event may even trigger world-wide economic depression. These terrible acts of terrorism must be fought with every ounce of American resolve. And those who commit such heinous acts must be punished to the fullest severity of the law. No such acts must ever be permitted on American soil. That being said, how then do we then protect ourselves from terror in the future? Because of increased scientific knowledge around the world, the next terror could be far more deadly than what happened on September 11. The next horrific occurrence might not even entail an explosion of any kind, but the silent mass death of a biological or radiation attack. The bad news is that no matter how many billions of dollars the government spends or how many bombs it drops, it is impossible to completely protect ourselves from these great dangers. In fact, the more bomb-dropping and devastation we do, the more likely a future terroristic response. We have moved into an era in which even sheer military might is no protection. No longer can strong nations attack weak ones with impunity. The tiniest nation or political entity can easily revenge itself with mass terror. No nation is invulnerable, even the strongest nation on earth. Unless we understand the why of these terroristic acts, the motivation behind them, we can not prevent a repeat of such terrorism in the future. We Americans must ask ourselves why we now suffer such terror. When a clock stops, we ask why. Is it not plugged in? Is the battery dead? Is it broken? If so, why is it broken? When you have a problem, if you don't ask why and get some good answers and act on them, it will persist. It may well even become a lot worse. The Zionist-dominated media has provided us in living color the gory details of this bloody attack on the American people. They have even told us who might be behind it, but so far they have carefully avoided giving an understandable reason why the attack took place. Calling the attackers "cowards" is, of course, untrue. The terrorists committed an indescribably horrible and ruthless act against the American people, but certainly they are not cowards. Kamikazes may be misguided, but sacrificing one's own life for a cause is not cowardice. And calling the perpetrators cowards or madmen doesn't answer the question of why these horrendous acts occurred, unless one thinks every coward and madman wants to blow up the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Those descriptions prevent people from discovering the reasons why the event actually occurred. And, if we want to prevent such occurrences from happening in the future, it is absolutely vital that to understand "why." Maybe a good first question to ask is why these "crazy," "cowardly," Arabs never attack Switzerland or Sweden? What could it be that those countries do or don't do that causes them to be ignored while we are targeted. Let me be very, very blunt. The ultimate cause of this terrorism stems directly from our involvement in and support of the criminal behavior of Israel. Terror in response to Terror The Palestinians and many of their Arab allies have been the target of a half century of unrelenting Israeli terrorism. In the late 1940s the Zionists took over Palestine and drove out 700,000 people from their homes through widespread acts of terrorism. Among those events was the sadistic massacre of 254 Palestinian mostly old men, women and children at Deir Yassin. It was an especially vicious, cold-blooded massacre characterized by Jews cutting apart the bellies of pregnant women. 1 After the bloodletting, the murderers then purposely publicized the event so as to make the people flee in panic from their homes and businesses from which they still haven't been allowed to return. Former Israel Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, a participant in this horrendous massacre, boasted of the importance of Deir Yassin in his book The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. He wrote that there would not have been a State of Israel without the "victory" of Deir Yassin. "The Haganah carried out victorious attacks on other fronts... In a state of terror, the Arabs fled, crying, 'Deir Yassin. 2" Nor did the massacres cease after the establishment of the Jewish State; they continued in times of both peace and war. Following are the names of some of them: Sharafat Massacre, Kibya Massacre, Kafr Qasem Massacre, Al-Sammou' Massacre, the Sabra And Shatila Massacre, Oyon Qara Massacre, Al-Aqsa Mosque Massacre, the Ibrahimi Mosque Massacre, the Jabalia Massacre. 3 In a policy of ethnic cleansing, Israel continues to keep residents of Palestine who were born there and whose families lived there for countless generations, from returning home. At the same time, it gives generous incentives for genetic Jews who never lived in Palestine to immigrate from the far corners of the world. The British also suffered greatly from Israeli terror, such as the horrendous bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. Israeli terror has not stopped since. Israel has more prisoners per capita than any other nation of the world, more than Stalinist Russia, or Red China during its worst periods. It routinely tortures its Palestinian prisoners, and is in fact the only nation in the modern world that legally sanctions torture. In fact, a Jewish human rights group in Israel confirmed in a 60 page report that 85% of Palestinian detainees undergo torture while in custody. 4 Even a major New York Times article by the Jewish Joel Greenburg, stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600 Palestinians every month. 5 Israel has targeted and assassinated thousands of Palestinian leaders, and this includes scholars, clerics, businessmen, philosophers and poets, anyone who inspires the Palestinian people to patriotism. These assassinations have occurred all over the world, even in the United States. In the process they have killed many thousands of women and children. They have even repeatedly bombed Palestinian refugee camps packed with women and children. Not only did they establish their Israeli state over Palestinian land, (in 1948 Palestinians personally owned over 90 percent of it) the Jews took almost all of the Palestinian personal property: the land, farms, homes and businesses. After they drove out the Palestinian refugees and refused their return, they then passed an "abandoned property" law that confiscated Palestinian property and gave to the Jews. The law even has the chutzpah to forbid ever selling any of their stolen land to Palestinians. 6 Former Jewish Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called the death of 500,000 Iraqi children from starvation due to UN sanctions, "acceptable." In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon. During their invasion and 18 year occupation an estimated 40,000 civilians died. Israel relentlessly bombed and attacked cities and villages and also many hospitals and orphanages (as documented by the Norwegian Red Cross) and devastated the ancient and once beautiful city of Beirut. The current Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon, doesn't dare even step foot in Belgium or the Netherlands, fearing an indictment of the World Court for war crimes. Sharon is responsible for the murder of two thousand of refugees in the Sabra and Shatila camps in Lebanon. Israel shot down a Libyan passenger airliner over the Sinai Peninsula killing 111 people. And it is has not just been the Palestinians who have suffered from Israeli terror. - Zionist Terror Against the United States, too? - Yes, it is true!.. Americans have also suffered from Zionist terror. In fact, Israel has committed a number of acts of war against the United States. Israel has a long record of terrorism against the United States going all the way back to 1954. In that year, the Israel government plotted to blow up American installations in Cairo and Alexandria and blame it on Egyptian nationals. By chance the plot failed and was uncovered. It was named the Lavon Affair after the man who supposedly set up the terrorism, Pinhas Lavon, the Israeli Defense Chief. He resigned in 1955 over the incident. 7 In 1967, Israel purposefully attacked with unmarked jet fighters and torpedo boats, the U.S.S. Liberty, an American Navy vessel of the Sinai Peninsula, even machine gunning the deployed life rafts of the ship. The attack killed 31 American servicemen and wounded over 170. 8 They sought to sink the ship, kill all the Americans and blame it on the Egyptians so they could have American support to conquer larger areas of the Arab world. The attack on the Liberty was nothing short of a vicious act of war against the United States by Israel. In spite of the fact that U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk and navy chief Admiral Moorer said that the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel was deliberate. The all-powerful Zionist Lobby prevented a formal Congressional investigation. If the Lobby can even cover up horrendous Israeli crimes against America, it's no wonder they can cover up Israel's endless crimes against the Palestinians. Yet, after the Liberty attack America didn't even reduce our billions of dollars of aid, in fact the story quickly vanished from the news after a few short days. What is left of the USS Liberty after the Israeli military attacked it on June 8, 1967. Thirty four US soldiers lost their lives. In 1986 Israel actually caused us to wrongly go to war and militarily attack another nation. The Mossad planted a transmitter in Tripoli, Libya and then broadcast terrorist messages in Libyan code indicating Libyan responsibility for killing two Americans in the bombing of the La Belle discothèque in Germany. 9 (It was later proven that Libya had nothing to do with the bombing) By use of this fraud, Israel induced the American bombing of Libya. American bombs wrecked havoc there. One of those killed was the infant daughter of the Libyan President. It is certainly a dastardly act of war against a nation to induce it into wrongly attacking another nation. Only a truly evil enemy of America would do such a thing. Every Palestinian and Arab is aware that Israel's half century of terror could never have occurred without the active financial, military, and diplomatic support of the United States. They know that the Jewish Lobby has control of American Mideast Policy and the Zionists can get whatever they want from Congress on issues important to them. It was American support of Israel's brutal invasion and occupation of Lebanon in the 1980s that led directly to the bombing of the U.S. Marine contingent, killing 300 American young men. - The Involvement of America in Israeli Crimes... - I'll tell. Well, Arabs know that almost every bomb that kills their people comes from America, Every bullet, every tank, every fighter plane, is manufactured or paid for by American dollars. It is America's billions of dollars of support that have enabled the Jewish state to terrorize the Arab people for half a century. Even though Israel invaded Lebanon and killed thousands of civilians, America never threatened to bomb Tel Aviv (as it did Iraq) if Israel refused to obey UN resolutions to withdraw. A comparison of America's reaction to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait to that of Israel's invasion of Lebanon is instructive. America's one-sided policy foreign policy can be illustrated by the different treatment afforded Israel and Iraq. Iraq invaded Kuwait. Israel invaded Lebanon. Perhaps 3000 Kuwait civilians died in the initial war with Iraq. 40,000 Lebanese died from the time of the invasion through the occupation. Iraq disobeyed UN resolutions to leave Kuwait. Israel disobeyed UN resolutions to leave Lebanon. (for 18 years) Iraq broke international conventions on chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Yet Israel is a far greater offender, having one of the greatest stores of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons in the world Iraq refused UN inspections. Israel has always refused UN inspection. For these violations we bombed Iraq. In response to Israel's crimes, America just continued to send more billions of dollars. American foreign policy was and continues to be Israeli policy. Israel was not threatened with even a cutoff of U.S. aid as thousands of Lebanese civilians died from the Israeli actions. Iraq was once a friend of America with whom we bought oil and did much business. America actually supported Saddam Hussein and Iraq's war with Iran. Iraq did nothing against the United States, but it made the mistake of becoming a strong enemy of Israel. So the Jewish and the Jewish-controlled gentile bureaucrats, and Jewish-dominated media quickly made our former friend, Saddam Hussein, into our archenemy. We dropped more explosives on Iraq country in a few weeks than we had in the whole of the Second World War. We killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis including tens of thousands of civilians. Then we engaged in a blockade and embargo of Iraq that even the anti-Iraq United Nations says led to the deaths of at least 1,200,000 children and hundreds of thousands of elderly. Let those Americans who don't understand the why of this terrorism concentrate on this shocking fact. One million, two hundred thousand children have died as a direct result of our policy toward Iraq. The Jewish Lobby and the Jewish-dominated media are very careful not to let the American people fully understand the real reason for the Iraqi war or the true issues in the Palestinian question. They really don't want Americans to know why so many millions in the Arab world hate us and why the number grows larger every day. They don't want us to know the real reasons why Americans are so hated -- because it is the Jewish bosses of American foreign policy who are the one's responsible for this growing hatred of America. Imagine the anger and feelings of despair that would drive men to sacrifice their own lives to get at us. The Zionist bosses know that by America's supporting the criminal policies of Israel spawns hatred against America. They are certainly aware that bombing and going to war against nations solely for Israel's benefit creates dedicated and fanatical enemies against America, enemies who will seek revenge in American blood. Of course, they never put America's interests first; their own Jewish interests are always paramount. In actuality, they are fully aware that the brutal and stupid acts of terror that recently happened in New York and Washington only help the Zionist cause by engendering enormous American anger at Israeli enemies, and make Americans more easily manipulated to do the bidding of Israel. Think about who really gained from this terror. Have the Palestinians benefited? This terrorist act destroyed all the progress the Palestinians have recently made with world opinion. It has blinded the world to Israeli terrorism. Israel is the only winner in this tragedy. They will now have a green light to do anything they want against the Palestinians. They can kill any of their foes whether they are violent or non-violent. They will get all the money they want from the American people, and no one will be thinking about their on-going suppression, murder and human rights violations against the Palestinian people. No, the Zionists are the only benefactors of the horrendous day of terror on September 11, 2001. Ironic isn't it, that although Zionist criminal actions led to this terror, only the Zionists will benefit from it. Of course, they reason they benefit because the American mass media is completely in their hands 10 and it will never ask the proper questions of why these horrendous events are happening. Unfortunately, too few people will ever hear voices such as mine who dare to challenge the Zionist lies. That's why we are in this mess, because a foreign power has become the most powerful lobby in the American government and controls the direction of the mass communication media in America. Let me repeat that one more time. The primary reason we are suffering from terrorism in the United States today is because our government policy is completely subordinated to a foreign power: Israel and the efforts of world-wide Jewish Supremacism. American Flags are flying everywhere in America in the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That is good, for we need to be more patriotic. If we were more patriotic for the real interests of America rather than for Israel, we would not now suffer from terrorism. And truly, what could be more patriotic than wanting our own country to be led by our own people in the service of America; not a foreign power or a powerful minority. Yes, we must fight tooth and nail against any terrorists who attack our country. But, we must understand why this terror is occurring, and how it has been spawned. It has occurred because of long-standing treason against the United States and her people. What has Zionism cost the American People? The Jewish Lobby and media power has cost the United States about 6 billion dollars a year in foreign aid and weapons, almost one third of America's entire foreign aid budget during the last half century and as much money spent in America's drug war. It has poisoned our relations with the oil-rich Mideast nations. In response to our policies, the Arabs came together and developed their "oil weapon" which has cost Americans at least ten at least ten trillion dollars in higher oil costs. It has alienated the entire Arab world, leading to destruction or confiscation of billions of dollars of American property in those countries, kidnapping of American citizens, and generated enormous hatred for the American people. How has Israel has paid us back for our support? They have continually spied on us on us (the Jonathan Pollard Case), sold our highest secrets (such as to the biggest nucleur threat to us currently in the world: the Communist Chinese) 11 and stolen our enriched uranium for their illegal nucleur weapons. 12 They have launched terrorist attacks against the United States such as the Lavon Affair and the Attack on the USS Liberty. Both these acts were nothing short of vicious acts of war against the United States. Providing false information for America to wrongly go to war against another country is also nothing less than an Israeli act of war against the United States. Yet, in response to these despicable actions against America, our Zionist controlled leaders did not even reduce our billions of dollars of financial and military aid to Israel. We give Israel about 6 billion dollars in aid each year, that is more than all the nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean and South America. What is the latest cost of our subservience to the criminal actions of Zionism? The latest price we have paid is the horrendous acts of terrorism on September 11, 2001. The powerful agents of Israel in American media and government are ultimately responsible for this terror against the United States just as surely as if they themselves had piloted those planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. And now they cynically plan to use the terror that they themselves created to increase the cycle of violence against Israel's enemies. You can be sure that the Zionist powers plan to do far more than simply punish the perpetrators of these events. America will once again be used to strike against whoever Israel wants. An indiscriminate or intemperate response from America would ultimately produce even more hatred against America, and bring more terroristic acts upon the heads of American people. The increasing cycle of hatred is exactly want the Zionists want, for their aim that we will fight Israel's enemies for them, spilling our blood instead of theirs. They are only ones who truly benefit from America's pain. Rather than Israel, we will pay the ultimate price. Unless we heal the wounds and give America a better course, every new missile and bomb we send, will come back to us again. Every life we take in foreign lands will result in more American lives lost here and abroad. America will sink more and more into uncertainty and fear. We must have cool heads now and break this cycle of violence. Many traitors in our government have supported Zionism's criminal activities rather than the true interests of the American people. They have spawned the hatred that drove these terrible acts. Unless their power is broken Americans will be haunted by an increasing specter of terrorism. Let us pray for the American victims of these events and for their suffering families. Let us swiftly and harshly punish the perpetrators of these dastardly acts. But, even more importantly, let us understand why these events occurred and how we can heal the hatred against our nation. Once we understand the reason why, then we will all agree on the sure way to prevent such terroristic acts in the future. The solution to this huge problem is extremely obvious and it is very simple. America must heed the farewell address of the Father of our Country and "avoid foreign entanglements." And we must always put America and the American People first. ** - I understand... - What did you understand? - Terror is never on error... as long as thus Zionist Imperialism continues and all the imperialists aware that terror is their product to continue sucking... - I agree with you!.. ** - On 25 june 2003 told the correspondents mostly on the peace... The following article was written before the announcement of a temporary ceasefire by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the Al-Aqsa brigades. This ceasefire may have raised hopes that the Road Map could bring about a sharp reduction in the bloodshed for a sustained length of time. However, as the article explains the Road Map gives no answers to the terrible conditions faced by the Palestinians and the huge difficulty of achieving a lasting peace in the Middle East under capitalism. CWI online. Sharon's deadly assassination squads... Human Butcher Ariel SHARON appears to be biting the hand that feeds him. The assassination of another leading Hamas activist by an Israeli hit squad has further undermined George Bush's efforts to put a lid on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict through its 'road map' peace initiative. This apparent wrecking strategy of Sharon comes only weeks after the US Congress approved a massive billion loans package to bolster Israel's faltering economy. US secretary of state Colin Powell, attending the World Economic Summit in neighbouring Jordan, barely concealed his anger at the Israeli government's action. He said the murder of Abdullah Qawasmeh in Hebron was a "matter of concern" that "could be an impediment to progress". However, Sharon had no regrets, saying the assassination was "a vital action designed to provide security for Israel's citizens". In fact, such actions will guarantee a retaliatory strike against Israeli citizens by Hamas, which has spurned attempts by Egypt and the US-approved Palestinian prime minister Mohammed Abbas to secure a ceasefire from the various Palestinian militias. Another indication of Sharon's insincerity is his attitude to the 'illegal' Jewish settlements in the West Bank. These settlements on Palestinian territory have flourished since Sharon became PM in 2001, despite some token dismantling in recent days of some 'hilltop settlements'. Sharon reportedly said last week that the settlers should continue to build, albeit more discreetly. So it's hardly surprising that most Palestinians are rightly cynical of the road map achieving anything positive, let alone a "viable Palestinian state". What they see is only a continuation of the occupation, oppression and impoverishment as the Israeli government's response to the Intifada. Many Israelis also remain sceptical of peace under Sharon's leadership. An Israeli newspaper opinion poll found that 40% of Israelis believe that the recent assassination attempt of Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi was a deliberate act to wreck the road map - 67% want these assassinations to stop to enable peace talks. Not that the road map, with its lack of concrete measures to resolve such issues as the right of return of Palestinian refugees, the status of Jerusalem, the financing of a 'viable Palestinian state' etc. offers a way forward for the working classes of the region. George Bush's plan is designed to bolster pro-US Arab regimes whose populations are incandescent at the US invasion of Iraq and the continuing national oppression of the Palestinians. The only viable solution to the wars, national conflicts, grinding poverty and extremes of inequality of the Middle East is the transformation of the region through the building of mass revolutionary socialist movements. People's Mojahedin - victims of imperialist rivalry... Twelve members of the exiled Iranian People's Mojahedin (MKO) have set themselves alight in a number of European capitals, including London, in protest at the arrest and detention of 160 MKO members in France. The French authorities are to investigate 17 MKO members for "conspiring with a terrorist organisation". Eleven are being held in custody including MKO leader Maryam Rajavi. The MKO is the political wing of the Mojahedin Khalq guerrillas who oppose the Iranian regime. The People's Mojahedin, a curious blend of Islam and 'Marxism', was a prominent force on the left during the early days of the 1978-79 Iranian revolution before being banished under Ayatollah Khomeini's regime (see the socialist 14 June). Its 10,000-strong militia has military bases inside Iraq and had enjoyed the patronage of Saddam Hussein. These bases were bombed by US forces during operation 'shock and awe'. The guerrillas have subsequently agreed to disarm since the US occupation of Iraq. The MKO has found itself the victim of inter-imperialist rivalry between the EU, principally the French government and the US. The US has targeted Iran as part of an "axis of evil" that aids and abets terrorism and that is pursuing a nuclear weapons programme. It has opportunistically encouraged regime change during the recent student-led protests against Iran's clerical leaders. However, the French government is pursuing its own imperialist policy to cultivate its capitalist interests in the Arab and Muslim countries of the Middle East. This includes maintaining friendly trade and diplomatic relations with Tehran, hence the arrests of the MKO members at its Paris compound. Imperialist wishes 1: AS THE US-led occupation of Iraq faces mounting opposition, the occupying forces keep up their aim of making the country into a 'free-market economy'. The US wants more privatisation - moving resources and workers from state enterprises to what they hope will be profit-making private-sector ventures. Paul Bremer, US 'civil administrator' for Iraq, acknowledged that this move would exacerbate social relations - mainly with mass sackings. Bremer made vague promises of some kind of "social safety net", paid for by Iraq's oil! Who'll gain most if this plan comes to fruition? The oil companies, mainly in the USA, and other big business enterprises, including a few Iraqi fat cats. Imperialist wishes 2. Top magazines in Britain's construction and civil engineering are running a conference on business opportunities arising from the Iraq reconstruction process. They will advise big business (or small business wanting to grow fat) on "the realities of doing business in Iraq", on "the challenges of doing business in a country which has been closed to business over the past decade" and other issues such as "developing an effective risk management strategy" in "what will become one of the fastest growing economies in the world". Well, that's that sorted then. After years of warfare at various levels, years of sanctions which "closed Iraq" to trade and had a devastating effect on the population, big business can see light at the end of the tunnel. For themselves! Military big spenders... The War (completely massacre) in Iraq pushed global spending on military purposes up 6% last year, says the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Expanding at twice the rate of the year before, it has now grown to 4 billion (£500 billion a year). US imperialism - responsible for three-quarters of the increase - accounted for 43% of global military spending last year (up from 36%). Washington spent an alarming 6 billion (0 billion) on arms. What's more, US defence budget estimates for 2003 showed a planned 32% increase in arms procurement over the 2002-2007 period, in line with ideas of a new global 'Pax Americana' with "full spectrum dominance". Other world powers find it hard to keep up. Western Europe's arms spending actually went down. Russia overtook the US as the world's biggest arms exporter while China, with imports estimated at growing 18% in 2002, was the biggest importer of arms. India and Pakistan, which came close to nuclear conflagration last year, both vastly increased their arms imports last year - India's 72% rise in imports making it the world's second largest buyer of arms from abroad. - The Socialist, paper of the Socialist Party, CWI in England and Wales shows who were the true terrorists... - Who were the "Bartards in Pentagon", ans Blix accused? - AlterNet Channel's correspondent asked same question... Steven Rosenfeld explains more on this subject on June 24, 2003 - Lets listen!.. - The Truth about the Lies... First we have a little notice... Editor's Note: With many Americans still exulting in the military victory in Iraq, it's hard to make a case that the administration's ends don't justify its means. However, the fact the administration has not found Iraqi weapons of mass destruction goes far deeper that whether the White House can be trusted, says Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington. The lingering WMD question reveals that this administration not only lied to Americans and the world about the reasons it went to war, but did so with a continuing disregard for some of the most fundamental U.S. and international laws. Phyllis Bennis was interviewed by TomPaine.com's Steven Rosenfeld. Hans Blix is retiring as the head of the U.N. weapons inspection teams. In recent days, he's made some statements about the Bush administration's characterizations of the U.N.'s work prior to the war in Iraq. What has he said? Well the first thing he said that was significant in this recent period was, in an exclusive interview with The Guardian in the U.K., he said that he was the victim of a smear campaign. He said "I was smeared" and he said by "bastards" – he used that word – in Washington. Now when he was pressed about whether he included the members of the U.S. administration in his characterization of "bastards," he said no, that he was referring to former arms inspectors and a former Swedish prime minister, who he didn't name but it was clear who he was referring to, who had spread critical assessments of his work during the whole period. But what's more significant, I think, is he's also taken the position that the U.S. decision to go to war based on evidence that turned out to be faulty, calls into question the whole issue of under what circumstances a war could be legal? And he comes down squarely on the side of a war is only acceptable if the [U.N.] Security Council has authorized it. Now, given the position that he's coming from, that's a very significant statement. Why is it significant in that context? Clearly he feels the fact that weapons of mass destruction have not been found, en masse, is, in a sense, a vindication of the U.N. inspection's prior work, right? Right. I don't think the issue is so much about the prior work. The attack on him from these unnamed "bastards" in Washington – and clearly [this includes] the members of the administration – he's presumably too diplomatic to admit it, but there's no doubt the members of the administration were furious with him. And at least on a not-for-attribution basis, were prepared to smear him as he said other bastards did from Washington. But what's also significant about this is that he referred specifically to earlier occasions in which the use of force had been based on intelligence claims that turned out to be false. He cited, specifically, U.S. attacks. He cited the bombing of the Chinese Embassy during the Kosovo War, in Belgrade, and said that was the result of false intelligence. He spoke of the bombing of a pharmaceutical factory in the Sudan, having been destroyed in the same way, also based on false intelligence. Then he went on to say, and I quote here, "A war was started based on intelligence (referring to Iraq). We still don't know if it was accurate. But it raises the question, on what basis can a war be started?" That's very significant, I think. What can one do with that question? Or where does one go from here, because clearly that's a legitimate point. But in a certain sense, might makes right with the Bush administration. Well, might makes might, at least. I don't know if it makes it right. But the power to do things gives them the willingness to do those things, and to claim legitimacy in doing so. I think what this speaks to is the question of how in the future, as well in the continuing investigation on Iraq – because we should be clear that this investigation is not over yet – the notion of resolving whether Iraq has weapons of mass destruction has become something far more important than just determining whether there is a remaining threat of a nuclear arsenal left over, or some such thing, as was once claimed. It's now a question of whether the entire episode of this U.S. war, which was claimed to be waged in the name of weapons of mass destruction and Iraq's links with Al Qaeda, was actually based on completely false evidence: whether that evidence was false when it reached the White House; whether it was cooked by the White House; whether it was both initially false and then cooked, so that all the various players are involved. The possibilities are legion for what this really represents. But it's extraordinary that we have not seen yet in the United States, even with these statements by Hans Blix; even with the recognition that no weapons of mass destruction have been found; even with the lies of the Bush administration – including as recently as a couple of weeks ago, when President Bush, with great joy, it seems, announced "we have found the weapons," when he was referring to two laboratories that had been found, in which inspectors have found absolutely zero sign of any actual chemical or biological contaminants. So this eagerness to move forward with their war, regardless of any actual information, is what's really at stake here. And the question of whether, in the future, weapons of mass destruction will be found in Iraq, goes directly to this issue. Those of us who were saying before that the weapons of mass destruction claim was a false claim, that it was a bogus claim – it wasn't because we never thought there could be any scrap of a weapon. There still could be. There may well be some scraps of some left-over weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. I'll say that right now just as I said it throughout the run-up to the war. But what we do know is there was nothing that was a viable strategic threat to the United States. That was a lie. That there were viable weapons was a lie. And the notion that we were right and they were wrong has not yet reached a level of outrage in the U.S. press, or among the U.S. public, it seems, in anywhere close to the level of outrage that it has sparked in the U.K. It wasn't only the American people who were lied to by our president. But it is the whole world that was led down the primrose path of lies and deceit by this administration, claiming evidence that they simply did not have. We don't know yet, we may never know, whether the evidence was simply ignored, made up or cooked. What we do know is they never had the evidence they claimed to have. We never had to go to war. Hans Blix may be trying to rescue or restore his reputation, but still the larger question remains of who is going to hold this administration accountable. Unfortunately, that is where the issue of might and right come into play. The United Nations should be in a position to hold this administration accountable. It should be U.N. weapons inspectors that are on the ground in Iraq, not the U.S. military, led, ironically enough, by a former U.N. weapons inspector from the earlier team – UNSCOM – the former director of UNSCOM, David Kay, has now been appointed special advisor to CIA Director [George] Tenet, to be his chief in charge of the weapons search. Why not go to the people who know how to do this? It was UNSCOM in their first years, from 1991 through 1995, who found and destroyed virtually all of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. In the years after that, what UNSCOM found was documents, not any existing weapons after that. That situation remains in place. That's who should be in charge. The problem is the U.S. has made clear, through its launching of this war without Security Council authorization, that they are not prepared to accept the legitimacy of U.N. rule, despite what the U.N. charter says, despite the U.S. being a signatory of the U.N. charter that says that war is only legitimate, either if it's authorized by the Security Council, which this was not, or if it's a question of direct and immediate self-defense, which this was not. Given that the U.S. has taken itself completely outside of the parameters and the requirements of international law, we probably should not be surprised that the U.N. is simply not in a position of power to hold the U.S. accountable. Is anything that might come from Congress too little, too late? At this point, I think it's very important that Congress move on this. It certainly is too late. It is important that it happen in the context of the increasing power concentration in the executive branch, which we're seeing, which is so dangerous in how this war was launched and waged. So certainly a congressional challenge to that concentration of power would be very important. It's not sufficient though. This is an assault on the legitimacy of international law as a whole, and it's a matter for the entire world. The whole world is paying the consequences – the people of Iraq, most specifically – but the whole world is paying the consequences for this Bush administration move, and it should be international jurisdiction that holds the U.S. accountable. Any likelihood of that? No so far. I don't think we can be optimistic about that anytime soon. Member states of the United Nations are terrified. The vote that the U.S. forced three weeks ago, to endorse the U.S.-British occupation of Iraq, endorse the U.S. war belatedly, came as a result of extraordinary U.S. pressure on member states. There is no willingness to stand defiant of the U.S. right now. We saw with the passage of the new resolution, three weeks ago, we ended an eight-and-a-half month extraordinary moment, in which the U.N. was doing exactly what it was designed to do by its founders: standing against war; standing defiant of an illegal war; preventing that war from going forward. It delayed the war. It prevented the war from happening when the U.S. wanted it. It prevented the U.S. from waging war with an international imprimatur, an international legitimization, and then it collapsed after eight-and-a-half months of doing the right thing, the Security Council collapsed under U.S. pressure. The goal, I think, now of those of us who are committed to international law, to internationalism, to the United Nations, is to figure out what it's going to take to make the U.N. able to go back to that position once again. So we're in an era where might makes right, even if it may not be right. And it doesn't matter if it starts with a bunch of lies, because if you have the biggest military you can just bully your way through. Absolutely. The question is, are we going to be in a position in this country to hold our government responsible for those violations of international law as much as we hold it responsible for the violations of U.S. law? All of those things are important. If we allow our government to get away with this power grab, both domestically and internationally, we are setting the stage for a far graver loss of democracy, both in our country and around the world, than anything we have seen so far. - Who is interviewed Blix? - Steffo.. Steven Rosenfeld is a commentary editor and audio producer for TomPaine.com. ** - Interesting.. I have an additional offical lie, here... - "Lying Us Into War".. prepared by Dennis Hans, AlterNet broadcasted on February 12, 2003: President George W. Bush and his foreign-policy team have systematically and knowingly deceived the American people in order to gain support for an unprovoked attack on Iraq. Before I catalog the Bush administration's "Techniques of Deceit," let me acknowledge that no U.N. resolution requires the president to be honest with the American people. The fine print of Resolution 1441 imposes no obligation to treat Americans as citizens to be informed rather than suckers to be conned. He may mislead, distort, suppress, exaggerate and lie to his heart's content without violating a single sentence in 1441. So if compliance with 1441 is all that matters to you, read no further. Turn on the TV and tune in Brokaw, Rather, Jennings, Blitzer or Lehrer, to name five of the journalistic imposters who control what you hear and see, who seem psychologically incapable of conceiving of Bush as a liar, and who wouldn't have the guts to call him one even if they reached that conclusion. But if you are an American citizen who believes in the bedrock democratic principle of "the informed consent of the governed," read on. Why lie? The president and many of his top advisers have wanted to invade and overthrow the government of Saddam Hussein for a long time. But they knew they couldn't sell such a war against Iraq to a majority of Americans and a majority in both houses of Congress if they acknowledged just how pitifully weak and unthreatening Iraq really is. If, however, the administration could portray Iraq as an imminent, mortal threat to the United States – and even a shadowy accomplice in the terrorist attacks of 9-11 – then a majority of the population might come to see an invasion of Iraq not as unprovoked U.S. aggression but as a wholly justified response to what Iraq did to us. That is precisely what the administration has done. In an October poll by the Pew Research Center for People and the Press, "66 percent believed [Saddam] was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States." Yes, two-thirds of Americans had come to believe a horrible thing about Saddam that the Bush administration knew for a fact was false, even as it encouraged its lesser spokespeople to continue to promote the connection. According to a Knight-Ridder poll conducted in January (.http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/4911975.htm.), 41 percent of us believe Iraq has a nuclear weapon RIGHT NOW and another 35 percent are unsure or refused to answer the question. Only 24 percent know what Bush knows for an absolute fact: Iraq has no nukes. And even many in that 24 percent might not realize that Iraq would still be several years away from developing a nuke even if we did the unthinkable and allowed them to import the vast array of high-tech equipment needed just to get started. How do people get such ridiculous thoughts in their head? A dishonest administration plants them there with a steady drumbeat of exaggerations, distortions and lies. In a process I call "lie and rely" (.http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0301/S00062.htm.), the administration relies on a cowed and craven news media to present their lies to the American people as fact – or at a minimum, as still-to-be-confirmed assertions by respected officials with a reputation for truth-telling. A handful of print reporters occasionally exposing the most egregious lies can't begin to overcome the effect of the steady drumbeat of lies reported as truth day after day on television. If we factored out of the opinion polls all the people who have internalized White House disinformation as fact, support for the president's position would plummet. Without the support of these misled millions, Bush wouldn't have been able to ramrod through Congress a blank-check declaration. He wouldn't have had that blank check to use as a bludgeon against the U.N., and the U.S. wouldn't be on the verge of committing an act of unprovoked aggression. How Bush lies: The Techniques of Deceit Although Bush presents himself to the world as a plain-spoken, straight-shooting friend of the common man, he regularly employs a variety of techniques to deceive the very people most inclined to trust him. So far, I have tallied 14 techniques. But there are more to be uncovered, and there are far more examples than I can include here. Consider this the tip of a deceitful iceberg. In the paragraphs that follow I first will describe the technique of deceit. Then I will illustrate it with one or more quotations or propaganda themes, placing within brackets that portion of the quote that illustrates the technique. Then I will explain how the president applied the technique. Unless otherwise noted, the president's words are from the State of the Union address. 1) Stating as fact what are allegations – often highly dubious ones (this is a staple of Bush's speeches and Powell's U.N. presentation; I'll limit myself to three): a) "From three Iraqi defectors [we know] that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein [has not disclosed] these facilities. He [has given no evidence] that he has destroyed them." What we "know" is that defectors make this unproven claim. We don't know if they were paid or coached to make the claim, or volunteered it on their own. For more on this, see Point 9 of the analysis ( .http://www.traprockpeace.org/firstresponse.html.) of Powell's address by Dr. Glen Rangwala, Lecturer in Politics at Cambridge University, an advisor to Labor Party opponents of Tony Blair and perhaps the world's foremost authority on U.S. claims about Iraq, which may explain why one never sees him in the U.S. media. Rangwala notes that one defector made no mention of the labs in his first press conferences. It was several months later, after "debriefings" by the U.S. and the Iraqi National Congress, that he started talking about mobile labs. Hans Blix told the Guardian newspaper of Britain (.http://truthout.org/docs_02/020603A.htm.) he has seen no evidence that these mobile labs exist. Acting on tips from the U.S. about labs disguised as food-testing trucks, he investigated. "Two food-testing trucks have been inspected and nothing has been found," he said. That doesn't mean that such labs don't exist, but at this point there simply is no proof of that claim. It is NOT an established fact. b) "The British government [has learned] that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Wrong verb. What he should have said is the Brits assert this but have produced no evidence of its veracity. The Brits have offered no date for these efforts, but "recently," in this case, may well mean "the 1980s." IAEA director Mohamed Elbaradei has for weeks been asking – so far, in vain – for the U.S. and Britain to provide "specifics of when and where." He said in a Jan. 12 interview, "We need actionable information." (Interview cited by Rangwala in his invaluable "Counter-Dossier II," ( .http://traprockpeace.org/weapons.html.) c) "We've [learned] that Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and deadly gases." (Bush's televised October speech) The L.A. Times reported a few days after that speech that CIA director "Tenet's letter was more equivocal, saying only that there has been 'reporting' that such training has taken place. Unlike other passages of the letter, he did not describe the reporting as 'solid' or 'credible.'" .http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/la-na-cia11oct11.story. 2) Withholding the key fact that destroys the moral underpinning of an argument (and, in Powell's case, reveals him to be a blood-drenched hypocrite): "Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a murderous tyrant, who [has already used chemical weapons to kill thousands of people.]" (Bush's October speech) The problem here is that much of Bush's national-security team aided and abetted those crimes. After the worst attack, on Halabja in 1988 near the end of the Iran-Iraq war, the Reagan team covered for Saddam by implicating Iran, then prevented Congress from imposing tough sanctions on Iraq. Joost R. Hiltermann, an official with Human Rights Watch, shows in a recent column for the International Herald Tribune (.http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0117-01.htm.) that Saddam was likely emboldened to use ever more lethal concoctions to polish off the Kurds because he knew from past gassing experience in 1983, 1984 and 1987 that he could always count on the support of Reagan, Powell and George H. W. Bush. The latter's son has yet to mention this in any of his righteous condemnations of Saddam. There are any number of governments who have the moral standing to condemn Saddam's gassing of the Kurds. The one headed by George W. Bush does not. Powell, of course, is the current administration's knight in shining armor, the trusted figure who commands the respect even of the European leaders who cannot stomach Bush. But give a listen to Peter W. Galbraith, former U.S. ambassador to Croatia and now professor of national-security studies at the National War College in Washington, D.C.: "the Kurds have not forgotten that Secretary of State Colin Powell was then the national security adviser who orchestrated Ronald Reagan's decision to give Hussein a pass for gassing the Kurds." .http://www.boston.com/globe/magazine/2002/1215/coverstory_entire.htm. 3) Misrepresentation/Invention: a) "I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied – finally denied access, a [report] came out of the Atomic – the IAEA that they were [six months away from developing a weapon]. I don't know what more [evidence] we need." (Bush speaking at a news conference Sept. 7 with Tony Blair) As Joseph Curl reported three weeks later in the conservative Washington Times, there was no such IAEA report: "In October 1998, just before Saddam kicked U.N. weapons inspectors out of Iraq [actually, they were withdrawn], the IAEA laid out a case opposite of Mr. Bush's Sept. 7 declaration: 'There are no indications that there remains in Iraq any physical capability for the production of weapon-usable nuclear material of any practical significance,' IAEA Director-General Mohammed Elbaradei wrote in a report to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan" (. |
| 13th September 2004 - 08:37:09 AM |
| 9899 : L337 G4m3r |
| Hey don't post using my nick dude. I'm no1 Xbox Live Gamer, I beat LisaSimpson42 in a Tekki Deathmatch last week and NOBODY fucks with me online, ever. Bitch. |
| 13th September 2004 - 09:02:18 AM |
| 9900 : spike |
| screech, i agree with the poster who suggested that mr. belding lose several loads in your beard immediately before you film your bands first music video. i also think that slater should shit in your mouth before you film the video. it would be so erotic to see slaters fecal matter on your teeth as you dance around during the video. |
| 13th September 2004 - 09:40:06 AM |
| 9901 : kevin fentress |
| the crul moon ,,,,the cruel moon hangs out of reach up above the shadowy beech. her face is stupid but her eyes. i small and sharp and very sly. nurse says the moon can drive you mad no. thats a silly story. lad though she be angry. though she would destroy all england if she could yet think. what damage can she do hanging there so far from you, dont heed what frightened nurses say moon hang much too far away. robert graves |
| 13th September 2004 - 10:15:34 AM |
| 9902 : kevin fentress |
| Anyone up for some double anal and snowballs? |
| 13th September 2004 - 03:08:51 PM |
| 9903 : |
| Kevin, you sound like my kind of queer. Do you know how to play a Russian Trumbone? I'll teach you to play mine, but you must be willing to wear ass-less chaps and a cowboy hat. PS - I love snowballing! |
| 13th September 2004 - 06:26:14 PM |
| 9904 : Gay Spiderman |
| My homo senses are tingling again, Screech! http://website.lineone.net/~milesbdyson/spidergaz1.jpg |
| 14th September 2004 - 12:13:09 AM |
| 9905 : mike wang |
| diamond i want to bust my nut in your face and crap all over your head. i always think about you when i sit on the toilet. i fantasize that when my turds hit the toilet water, they are actually landing directly in your mouth and you are gobbling them up like the fecal muncher that you are. did ever get typhoid from eating the saved by the bell castmembers' shit? |
| 14th September 2004 - 05:42:08 AM |
| 9906 : T_O_O_Y_O_U_N_G_E_R_S___F_U_C_K_ (VERY HOT) T_O_O |
| ß T_O_O_Y_O_U_N_G_E_R_S___F_U_C_K_ (VERY HOT) T_O_O_Y_O_U_N_G_E_R_S___F_U_C_K_ (VERY HOT) ë |
| 14th September 2004 - 07:59:53 AM |
| 9907 : T_O_O_Y_O_U_N_G_E_R_S___F_U_C_K_ (VERY HOT) T_O_O |
| I have full-blown AIDS, and when I'm not spamming websites like the worthless piece of human excrement I am, I like nothing more than blowing my HIV+ loads up the anuses of pre-schoolers. It's true ya know! |